| by Nick Otten Clayton High School Clayton, Missouri | ||||||
| Note-Taking vs. Annotation Most serious readers take notes of some kind when they are carefully considering a text, but many readers are too casual about their note-taking. Later they realize they have taken notes that are incomplete or too random, and then they laboriously start over, re-notating an earlier reading. Others take notes only when cramming for a test, which is often merely "better than nothing." Students can easily improve the depth of their reading and extend their understanding over long periods of time by developing a systematic form of annotating. Such a system is not necessarily difficult and can be completely personal and exceptionally useful. First, what is the difference between annotating and "taking notes"? For some people, the difference is nonexistent or negligible, but in this instance I am referring to a way of making notes directly onto a text such as a book, a handout, or another type of publication. The advantage of having one annotated text instead of a set of note papers plus a text should be clear enough: all the information is together and inseparable, with notes very close to the text for easier understanding, and with fewer pieces to keep organized. What the reader gets from annotating is a deeper initial reading and an understanding of the text that lasts. You can deliberately engage the author in conversation and questions, maybe stopping to argue, pay a compliment, or clarify an important issue—much like having a teacher or storyteller with you in the room. If and when you come back to the book, that initial interchange is recorded for you, making an excellent and entirely personal study tool. Below are instructions adapted from a handout that I have used for years with my high school honors students as well as graduate students. Criteria for Successful AnnotationFigure 1: Walden, pp. 212-213 (.pdf/1.6MB) 2. PencilFigure 2: Walden, inside front cover (.pdf/844KB) As you read, section by section, chapter by chapter, consider doing the following, if useful or necessary:Just how idiosyncratic and useful can annotating be? A good example is in William Gilbert's De Magnete, Magneticisque Corporibus, et de Magno Magnete Tellure (On the Magnet, Magnetic Bodies, and the Great Magnet the Earth), one of the seminal works of the Renaissance, published in the year 1600. Gilbert was the personal physician of Queen Elizabeth I and has been called the father of experimental science in England. Robert B. Downs, in Famous Books Since 1492, writes that in De Magnete, Gilbert annotated the text prior to publication by putting stars of varying sizes in the margins to indicate the relative importance of the discoveries described. Gilbert also included in the original edition a glossary of new scientific terms that he invented. Okay, a self-annotated book on magnetism by a celebrity doctor from the time of Shakespeare, with variable-size stars in the margins and a list (in the back) of his own new vocabulary words that changed science as we know it—that's useful idiosyncrasy. References Thoreau, Henry David. Walden. New York: The New American Library of World Literature, Inc., 1960. Illustration Credits Figure 1: Thoreau, Henry David. Walden. New York: The New American Library of World Literature, Inc., 1960. Photo by Nick Otten. Figure 2: Thoreau, Henry David. Walden. New York: The New American Library of World Literature, Inc., 1960. Photo by Nick Otten. |